Targeting TRIP13 in favorable histology Wilms tumor with nuclear export inhibitors synergizes with doxorubicin.

Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common renal malignancy of childhood. Despite improvements in the overall survival, relapse occurs in ~15% of patients with favorable histology WT (FHWT). Half of these patients will succumb to their disease. Identifying novel targeted therapies remains challenging in part due to the lack of faithful preclinical in vitro models. Here we establish twelve patient-derived WT cell lines and demonstrate that these models faithfully recapitulate WT biology using genomic and transcriptomic techniques. We then perform loss-of-function screens to identify the nuclear export gene, XPO1, as a vulnerability. We find that the FDA approved XPO1 inhibitor, KPT-330, suppresses TRIP13 expression, which is required for survival. We further identify synergy between KPT-330 and doxorubicin, a chemotherapy used in high-risk FHWT. Taken together, we identify XPO1 inhibition with KPT-330 as a potential therapeutic option to treat FHWTs and in combination with doxorubicin, leads to durable remissions in vivo.

Analytical validation of the 7-gene biosignature for prediction of recurrence risk and radiation therapy benefit for breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), is a noninvasive breast cancer, representing 20-25% of breast cancer diagnoses in the USA. Current treatment options for DCIS include mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without radiation therapy (RT), but optimal risk-adjusted treatment selection remains a challenge. Findings from past and recent clinical trials have failed to identify a 'low risk' group of patients who do not benefit significantly from RT after BCS. To address this unmet need, a DCIS biosignature, DCISionRT (PreludeDx, Laguna Hills, CA), was developed and validated in multiple cohorts. DCISionRT is a molecular assay with an algorithm reporting a recurrence risk score for patients diagnosed with DCIS intended to guide DCIS treatment. In this study, we present results from analytical validity, performance assessment, and clinical performance validation and clinical utility for the DCISionRT test comprised of multianalyte assays with algorithmic analysis. Methods: The analytical validation of each molecular assay was performed based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines Quality Assurance for Design Control and Implementation of Immunohistochemistry Assays and the College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) recommendations for analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Results: The analytic validation showed that the molecular assays that are part of DCISionRT test have high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy/reproducibility (≥95%). The analytic precision of the molecular assays under controlled non-standard conditions had a total standard deviation of 6.6 (100-point scale), where the analytic variables (Lot, Machine, Run) each contributed <1% of the total variance. Additionally, the precision in the DCISionRT test result (DS) had a 95%CI ≤0.4 DS units under controlled non-standard conditions (Day, Lot, and Machine) for molecular assays over a wide range of clinicopathologic factor values. Clinical validation showed that the test identified 37% of patients in a low-risk group with a 10-year invasive IBR rate of ~3% and an absolute risk reduction (ARR) from RT of 1% (number needed to treat, NNT=100), while remaining patients with higher DS scores (elevated-risk) had an ARR for RT of 9% (NNT=11) and 96% clinical sensitivity for RT benefit. Conclusion: The analytical performance of the PreludeDx DCISionRT molecular assays was high in representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens. The DCISionRT test has been analytically validated and has been clinically validated in multiple peer-reviewed published studies.

A Novel Biosignature Identifies Patients With DCIS With High Risk of Local Recurrence After Breast Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: There is an unmet need to identify women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with a low risk of in-breast recurrence (IBR) after breast conserving surgery (BCS), which could omit radiation therapy (RT), and also to identify those with elevated IBR risk remaining after BCS plus RT. We evaluated a novel biosignature for a residual risk subtype (RRt) to help identify patients with elevated IBR risk after BCS plus RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women with DCIS treated with BCS with or without RT at centers in the US, Australia, and Sweden (n = 926) were evaluated. Patients were classified into 3 biosignature risk groups using the decision score (DS) and the RRt category: (1) Low Risk (DS ≤2.8 without RRt), (2) Elevated Risk (DS >2.8 without RRt), and (3) Residual Risk (DS >2.8 with RRt). Total and invasive IBR rates were assessed by risk group and treatment. RESULTS: In patients at low risk, there was no significant difference in IBR rates with or without RT (total, P = .8; invasive IBR, P = .7), and there were low overall 10-year rates (total, 5.1%; invasive, 2.7%). In patients with elevated risk, IBR rates were decreased with RT (total: hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; P < .001; invasive: HR, 0.28; P = .005); 10-year rates were 20.6% versus 4.9% (total) and 10.9% versus 3.1% (invasive). In patients with residual risk, although IBR rates decreased with RT after BCS (total: HR, 0.21; P < .001; invasive: HR, 0.29; P = .028), IBR rates remained significantly higher after RT compared with patients with elevated risk (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.4; P = .018), with 10-year rates of 42.1% versus 14.7% (total) and 18.3% versus 6.5% (invasive). CONCLUSIONS: The novel biosignature identified patients with 3 distinct risk profiles: Low Risk patients with a low recurrence risk with or without adjuvant RT, Elevated Risk patients with excellent outcomes after BCS plus RT, and Residual Risk patients with an elevated recurrence risk remaining after BCS plus RT, warranting potential intensified or alternative treatment approaches.

A Case Series Exploration of Multi-Regional Expression Heterogeneity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients.

Extensive intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) is believed to contribute to therapeutic failure and tumor recurrence, as treatment-resistant cell clones can survive and expand. However, little is known about ITH in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) because of the limited number of single-cell sequencing studies on TNBC. In this study, we explored ITH in TNBC by evaluating gene expression-derived and imaging-derived multi-region differences within the same tumor. We obtained tissue specimens from 10 TNBC patients and conducted RNA sequencing analysis of 2-4 regions per tumor. We developed a novel analysis framework to dissect and characterize different types of variability: between-patients (inter-tumoral heterogeneity), between-patients across regions (inter-tumoral and region heterogeneity), and within-patient, between-regions (regional intratumoral heterogeneity). We performed a Bayesian changepoint analysis to assess and classify regional variability as low (convergent) versus high (divergent) within each patient feature (TNBC and PAM50 subtypes, immune, stroma, tumor counts and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes). Gene expression signatures were categorized into three types of variability: between-patients (108 genes), between-patients across regions (183 genes), and within-patients, between-regions (778 genes). Based on the between-patient gene signature, we identified two distinct patient clusters that differed in menopausal status. Significant intratumoral divergence was observed for PAM50 classification, tumor cell counts, and tumor-infiltrating T cell abundance. Other features examined showed a representation of both divergent and convergent results. Lymph node stage was significantly associated with divergent tumors. Our results show extensive intertumoral heterogeneity and regional ITH in gene expression and image-derived features in TNBC. Our findings also raise concerns regarding gene expression based TNBC subtyping. Future studies are warranted to elucidate the role of regional heterogeneity in TNBC as a driver of treatment resistance.

Hypoxia Drives Centrosome Amplification in Cancer Cells via HIF1α-dependent Induction of Polo-Like Kinase 4.

Centrosome amplification (CA) has been implicated in the progression of various cancer types. Although studies have shown that overexpression of PLK4 promotes CA, the effect of tumor microenvironment on polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) regulation is understudied. The aim of this study was to examine the role of hypoxia in promoting CA via PLK4. We found that hypoxia induced CA via hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α). We quantified the prevalence of CA in tumor cell lines and tissue sections from breast cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer and found that CA was prevalent in cells with increased HIF1α levels under normoxic conditions. HIF1α levels were correlated with the extent of CA and PLK4 expression in clinical samples. We analyzed the correlation between PLK4 and HIF1A mRNA levels in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets to evaluate the role of PLK4 and HIF1α in breast cancer and PDAC prognosis. High HIF1A and PLK4 levels in patients with breast cancer and PDAC were associated with poor overall survival. We confirmed PLK4 as a transcriptional target of HIF1α and demonstrated that in PLK4 knockdown cells, hypoxia-mimicking agents did not affect CA and expression of CA-associated proteins, underscoring the necessity of PLK4 in HIF1α-related CA. To further dissect the HIF1α-PLK4 interplay, we used HIF1α-deficient cells overexpressing PLK4 and showed a significant increase in CA compared with HIF1α-deficient cells harboring wild-type PLK4. These findings suggest that HIF1α induces CA by directly upregulating PLK4 and could help us risk-stratify patients and design new therapies for CA-rich cancers. IMPLICATIONS: Hypoxia drives CA in cancer cells by regulating expression of PLK4, uncovering a novel HIF1α/PLK4 axis.

Centrosome amplification: a quantifiable cancer cell trait with prognostic value in solid malignancies.

Numerical and/or structural centrosome amplification (CA) is a hallmark of cancers that is often associated with the aberrant tumor karyotypes and poor clinical outcomes. Mechanistically, CA compromises mitotic fidelity and leads to chromosome instability (CIN), which underlies tumor initiation and progression. Recent technological advances in microscopy and image analysis platforms have enabled better-than-ever detection and quantification of centrosomal aberrancies in cancer. Numerous studies have thenceforth correlated the presence and the degree of CA with indicators of poor prognosis such as higher tumor grade and ability to recur and metastasize. We have pioneered a novel semi-automated pipeline that integrates immunofluorescence confocal microscopy with digital image analysis to yield a quantitative centrosome amplification score (CAS), which is a summation of the severity and frequency of structural and numerical centrosome aberrations in tumor samples. Recent studies in breast cancer show that CA increases across the disease progression continuum, while normal breast tissue exhibited the lowest CA, followed by cancer-adjacent apparently normal, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive tumors, which showed the highest CA. This finding strengthens the notion that CA could be evolutionarily favored and can promote tumor progression and metastasis. In this review, we discuss the prevalence, extent, and severity of CA in various solid cancer types, the utility of quantifying amplified centrosomes as an independent prognostic marker. We also highlight the clinical feasibility of a CA-based risk score for predicting recurrence, metastasis, and overall prognosis in patients with solid cancers.

Hypoxia-Induced Centrosome Amplification Underlies Aggressive Disease Course in HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-neg) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) are associated with poorer overall survival (OS) compared with HPV-positive (HPV-pos) OPSCCs. The major obstacle in improving outcomes of HPV-neg patients is the lack of robust biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Herein, we investigated the role of centrosome amplification (CA) as a prognostic biomarker in HPV-neg OPSCCs. A quantitative evaluation of CA in clinical specimens of OPSCC revealed that (a) HPV-neg OPSCCs exhibit higher CA compared with HPV-pos OPSCCs, and (b) CA was associated with poor OS, even after adjusting for potentially confounding clinicopathologic variables. Contrastingly, CA was higher in HPV-pos cultured cell lines compared to HPV-neg ones. This divergence in CA phenotypes between clinical specimens and cultured cells can therefore be attributed to an inaccurate recapitulation of the in vivo tumor microenvironment in the cultured cell lines, namely a hypoxic environment. The exposure of HPV-neg OPSCC cultured cells to hypoxia or stabilizing HIF-1α genetically increased CA. Both the 26-gene hypoxia signature as well as the overexpression of HIF-1α positively correlated with increased CA in HPV-neg OPSCCs. In addition, we showed that HIF-1α upregulation is associated with the downregulation of miR-34a, increase in CA and expression of cyclin- D1. Our findings demonstrate that the evaluation of CA may aid in therapeutic decision-making, and CA can serve as a promising therapeutic target for HPV-neg OPSCC patients.

Spotlighting the hypoxia-centrosome amplification axis.

The abysmal success rate of anticancer drugs in clinical trials, is in part, attributable to discordance between cultured cancer cells and patient tumors. While tumors in vivo, display a lower mitotic index, patient tumors portray much higher centrosomal aberrations, relative to in vitro cultured cells. The microenvironment too differs considerably between the in vitro and in vivo scenarios. Notably, another hallmark of cancer, hypoxia, is not recapitulated in cell lines cultured under normoxic conditions. These observations raise the possibility that hypoxia may be the missing link that explains the discordance between cell biological phenomena in vitro versus physiological conditions. Further, the interplay between hypoxia and centrosome amplification (CA) is relatively understudied. Recent research from our laboratory, geared toward examining the biological link between the two, has uncovered that hypoxia induces the expression of proteins (Plk4, Aurora A, Cyclin D) implicated in CA, in a hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α)-dependent context. Our studies evidence that hypoxia fuels CA that underlie intratumoral heterogeneity and metastatic potential of cancer cells. Given the advent of HIF-1α inhibitors, this research has ramifications in aiding patient risk stratification and designing new cancer drug therapies to facilitate clinical decision-making.

A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to predict risk of local recurrence (LR) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with a new visualization and quantification approach using centrosome amplification (CA), a cancer cell-specific trait widely associated with aggressiveness. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This first-of-its-kind methodology evaluates the severity and frequency of numerical and structural CA present within DCIS and assigns a quantitative centrosomal amplification score (CAS) to each sample. Analyses were performed in a discovery cohort (DC, n = 133) and a validation cohort (VC, n = 119). RESULTS: DCIS cases with LR exhibited significantly higher CAS than recurrence-free cases. Higher CAS was associated with a greater risk of developing LR (HR, 6.3 and 4.8 for DC and VC, respectively; P < 0.001). CAS remained an independent predictor of relapse-free survival (HR, 7.4 and 4.5 for DC and VC, respectively; P < 0.001) even after accounting for potentially confounding factors [grade, age, comedo necrosis, and radiotherapy (RT)]. Patient stratification using CAS (P < 0.0001) was superior to that by Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI; HR for CAS = 6.2 vs. HR for VNPI = 1.1). Among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery alone, CAS identified patients likely to benefit from adjuvant RT. CONCLUSIONS: CAS predicted 10-year LR risk for patients who underwent surgical management alone and identified patients who may be at low risk of recurrence, and for whom adjuvant RT may not be required. CAS demonstrated the highest concordance among the known prognostic models such as VNPI and clinicopathologic variables such as grade, age, and comedo necrosis.

Prognostic significance of cathepsin V (CTSV/CTSL2) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

AIMS: Cathepsin V (CTSV/CTSL2) is a lysosomal cysteine proteinase and plays a role in extracellular matrix degradation. It is associated with poor prognosis in invasive breast cancer (IBC), but its role in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of CTSV in DCIS. METHODS: CTSV protein expression was immunohistochemically assessed in a well-characterised and annotated cohort of DCIS comprising pure DCIS (n=776) and DCIS coexisting with IBC (n=239). CTSV expression was analysed in tumour cells and surrounding stroma, including its association with clinicopathological parameters and outcome. RESULTS: In pure DCIS, high CTSV expression was observed in 29% of epithelial tumour cells and 20% of surrounding stroma. High expression in both components was associated with features of poor prognosis including higher nuclear grade, hormone receptor negativity and HER2 positivity. In addition, stromal CTSV expression was associated with larger DCIS size, comedo-type necrosis and high proliferation index. DCIS associated with IBC showed higher CTSV expression than pure DCIS either within the epithelial tumour cells or surrounding stroma (p<0.0001 and p=0.001, respectively). In DCIS/IBC, CTSV expression was higher in the invasive component than DCIS component either in tumour cells or surrounding stroma (both p<0.0001). CTSV stromal expression was associated with invasive recurrence independent of other prognostic factors in patients treated with breast conserving surgery (HR=3.0, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: High expression of CTSV is associated with poor outcome in DCIS and is a potential marker to predict DCIS progression to invasive disease.

Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management.

The efforts to personalize treatment for patients with breast cancer have led to a focus on the deeper characterization of genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity among breast cancers. Traditional pathology utilizes microscopy to profile the morphologic features and organizational architecture of tumor tissue for predicting the course of disease, and is the first-line set of guiding tools for customizing treatment decision-making. Currently, clinicians use this information, combined with the disease stage, to predict patient prognosis to some extent. However, tumoral heterogeneity stubbornly persists among patient subgroups delineated by these clinicopathologic characteristics, as currently used methodologies in diagnostic pathology lack the capability to discern deeper genotypic and subtler phenotypic differences among individual patients. Recent advancements in molecular pathology, however, are poised to change this by joining forces with multiple-omics technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) that provide a wealth of data about the precise molecular complement of each patient's tumor. In addition, these technologies inform the drivers of disease aggressiveness, the determinants of therapeutic response, and new treatment targets in the individual patient. The tumor architecture information can be integrated with the knowledge of the detailed mutational, transcriptional, and proteomic phenotypes of cancer cells within individual tumors to derive a new level of biologic insight that enables powerful, data-driven patient stratification and customization of treatment for each patient, at each stage of the disease. This review summarizes the prognostic and predictive insights provided by commercially available gene expression-based tests and other multivariate or clinical -omics-based prognostic/predictive models currently under development, and proposes a more inclusive multiplatform approach to tackling the challenging heterogeneity of breast cancer to individualize its management. "The future is already here-it's just not very evenly distributed."-William Ford Gibson.

Prognostic Role of Androgen Receptor in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: The androgen receptor (AR) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for AR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, conflicting reports regarding AR's prognostic role in TNBC are putting its usefulness in question. Some studies conclude that AR positivity indicates a good prognosis in TNBC, whereas others suggest the opposite, and some show that AR status has no significant bearing on the patients' prognosis. METHODS: We evaluated the prognostic value of AR in resected primary tumors from TNBC patients from six international cohorts {US (n = 420), UK (n = 239), Norway (n = 104), Ireland (n = 222), Nigeria (n = 180), and India (n = 242); total n = 1407}. All TNBC samples were stained with the same anti-AR antibody using the same immunohistochemistry protocol, and samples with ≥1% of AR-positive nuclei were deemed AR-positive TNBCs. RESULTS: AR status shows population-specific patterns of association with patients' overall survival after controlling for age, grade, population, and chemotherapy. We found AR-positive status to be a marker of good prognosis in US and Nigerian cohorts, a marker of poor prognosis in Norway, Ireland and Indian cohorts, and neutral in UK cohort. CONCLUSION: AR status, on its own, is not a reliable prognostic marker. More research to investigate molecular subtype composition among the different cohorts is warranted.

Geometric characteristics of collagen have independent prognostic significance in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: an image analysis study.

Collagen plays a key role in normal and malignant tissue homeostasis. While the prognostic significance of collagen fiber remodeling in invasive breast cancer has been studied, its role in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains poorly defined. Using image analysis, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the geometric characteristics of collagen surrounding DCIS. A large well-characterized cohort of DCIS comprising pure DCIS (n = 610) and DCIS coexisting with invasive carcinoma (n = 180) were histochemically stained for collagen using picrosirius red. ImageJ software was used to assess collagen density, degree of collagen fiber dispersion and directionality in relation to DCIS ducts' boundary. We developed a collagen prognostic index and evaluated its prognostic significance. A poor index was observed in 24% of the pure DCIS and was associated with determinants of high-risk DCIS including higher nuclear grade, comedo type necrosis, hormonal receptor negativity, HER2 positivity and high proliferation index. High collagen prognostic index was associated with the collagen remodeling protein prolyl-4-hydroxlase alpha subunit 2 and the hypoxia-related protein hypoxia inducible factor 1α. DCIS coexisting with invasive breast cancer had a higher collagen prognostic index than pure DCIS ( p < 0.0001). High index was an independent poor prognostic factor for DCIS recurrence for all recurrences (HR = 2.3, p = 0.005) and just invasive recurrences (HR = 3.4, p = 0.003). Interaction between collagen prognostic index and radiotherapy showed that the index was associated with poor outcome even with adjuvant radiotherapy ( p = 0.0001). Collagen reorganization around DCIS is associated with poor outcome and provides a potential predictor for disease progression and resistance to radiotherapy. Mechanistic studies are warranted to decipher the underlying mechanisms.

Collagen (XI) alpha-1 chain is an independent prognostic factor in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Collagen11A1 (COL11A1) is a fibrillary type collagen constituting a minor component of the extracellular matrix and plays role in tissue tensile strength. Overexpression of COL11A1 expression is associated with aggressive behavior and poor outcome in several human malignancies. In this study, we evaluated the association between COL11A1 expression and clinicopathological parameters of the breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its prognostic value. COL11A1 protein expression was assessed immunohistochemically in a large well-characterized cohort of DCIS including pure (n = 776) and DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma (DCIS-mixed, n = 239). COL11A1 expression was assessed in tumor cells and surrounding stromal cells, and correlated with clinicopathological parameters, immunoprofile and disease outcome. In pure DCIS, high COL11A1 expression was observed in tumor cells and surrounding stromal cells in 25 and 13% of cases, respectively. Higher COL11A1 expression within the stromal cells was associated with hormone receptor negative, HER2 enriched and triple negative molecular subtypes and showed a positive linear correlation with proliferation index, dense tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. COL11A1 expression in tumor and stromal cells was significantly higher in DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma than in pure DCIS, and within the DCIS-mixed cohort, the invasive component showed higher COL11A1 expression than the DCIS component (all, p < 0.0001). Overexpression of stromal COL11A1 was an independent predictor of shorter local recurrence-free interval for all recurrences (HR = 13.2, 95% CI = 6.9-25.4, p < 0.0001) and for invasive recurrences (HR = 11.2, 95% CI = 4.9-25.8, p < 0.0001). When incorporated with other risk factors, stromal COL11A1 provided better patient risk stratification. DCIS with higher stromal COL11A1 expression showed poor outcome even with adjuvant radiotherapy management. In conclusion, overexpression of stromal COL11A1 is associated with invasive recurrence in DCIS and is a potential marker to predict the response to radiotherapy.

The prognostic significance of lysosomal protective protein (cathepsin A) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

AIMS: Cathepsin A (CTSA) is a key regulatory enzyme for galactoside metabolism. Additionally, it has a distinct proteolytic activity and plays a role in tumour progression. CTSA is differentially expressed at the mRNA level between breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast carcinoma (IBC). In this study, we aimed to characterise CTSA protein expression in DCIS and evaluate its prognostic significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: A large cohort of DCIS [n = 776 for pure DCIS and n = 239 for DCIS associated with IBC (DCIS/IBC)] prepared as a tissue microarray was immunohistochemically stained for CTSA. High CTSA expression was observed in 48% of pure DCIS. High expression was associated with features of poor DCIS prognosis, including younger age at diagnosis (<50 years), higher nuclear grade, hormone receptor negativity, HER2 positivity, high proliferative index and high hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha expression. High CTSA expression was associated with shorter recurrence-free interval (RFI) (P = 0.0001). In multivariate survival analysis for patients treated with breast conserving surgery, CTSA was an independent predictor of shorter RFI (P = 0.015). DCIS associated with IBC showed higher CTSA expression than pure DCIS (P = 0.04). In the DCIS/IBC cohort, CTSA expression was higher in the invasive component than the DCIS component (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: CTSA is not only associated with aggressive behaviour and poor outcome in DCIS but also a potential marker to predict co-existing invasion in DCIS.

Multinucleated polyploidy drives resistance to Docetaxel chemotherapy in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is the only FDA-approved first-line treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. Docetaxel treatment inevitably leads to tumour recurrence after an initial therapeutic response with generation of multinucleated polyploid (MP) cells. Here we investigated role of MP cells in clinical relapse of CRPC. METHODS: Prostate cancer (PC-3) cells were treated with docetaxel (5 nM) for 3 days followed by a washout and samples were collected at close intervals over 35 days post drug washout. The tumorigenic potential of the giant MP cells was studied by implanting MP cells subcutaneously as tumour xenografts in nude mice. RESULTS: Docetaxel-induced polyploid cells undergo mitotic slippage and eventually spawn mononucleated cells via asymmetric cell division or neosis. Both MP and cells derived from polyploid cells had increased survival signals, were positive for CD44 and were resistant to docetaxel chemotherapy. Although MP cells were tumorigenic in nude mice, these cells took a significantly longer time to form tumours compared with parent PC-3 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Generation of MP cells upon docetaxel therapy is an adaptive response of apoptosis-reluctant cells. These giant cells ultimately contribute to the generation of mononucleated aneuploid cells via neosis and may have a fundamental role precipitating clinical relapse and chemoresistance in CRPC.

Amplified centrosomes and mitotic index display poor concordance between patient tumors and cultured cancer cells.

Centrosome aberrations (CA) and abnormal mitoses are considered beacons of malignancy. Cancer cell doubling times in patient tumors are longer than in cultures, but differences in CA between tumors and cultured cells are uncharacterized. We compare mitoses and CA in patient tumors, xenografts, and tumor cell lines. We find that mitoses are rare in patient tumors compared with xenografts and cell lines. Contrastingly, CA is more extensive in patient tumors and xenografts (~35-50% cells) than cell lines (~5-15%), although CA declines in patient-derived tumor cells over time. Intratumoral hypoxia may explain elevated CA in vivo because exposure of cultured cells to hypoxia or mimicking hypoxia pharmacologically or genetically increases CA, and HIF-1α and hypoxic gene signature expression correlate with CA and centrosomal gene signature expression in breast tumors. These results highlight the importance of utilizing low-passage-number patient-derived cell lines in studying CA to more faithfully recapitulate in vivo cellular phenotypes.

Multi-institutional study of nuclear KIFC1 as a biomarker of poor prognosis in African American women with triple-negative breast cancer.

Nuclear KIFC1 (nKIFC1) predicts worse outcomes in breast cancer, but its prognostic value within racially distinct triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients is unknown. Thus, nKIFC1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 163 African American (AA) and 144 White TNBC tissue microarrays (TMAs) pooled from four hospitals. nKIFC1 correlated significantly with Ki67 in White TNBCs but not in AA TNBCs, suggesting that nKIFC1 is not merely a surrogate for proliferation in AA TNBCs. High nKIFC1 weighted index (WI) was associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (Hazard Ratios [HRs] = 3.5, 3.1, and 3.8, respectively; P = 0.01, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively) in multivariable Cox models in AA TNBCs but not White TNBCs. Furthermore, KIFC1 knockdown more severely impaired migration in AA TNBC cells than White TNBC cells. Collectively, these data suggest that nKIFC1 WI an independent biomarker of poor prognosis in AA TNBC patients, potentially due to the necessity of KIFC1 for migration in AA TNBC cells.

A centrosome clustering protein, KIFC1, predicts aggressive disease course in serous ovarian adenocarcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Amplified centrosomes are widely recognized as a hallmark of cancer. Although supernumerary centrosomes would be expected to compromise cell viability by yielding multipolar spindles that results in death-inducing aneuploidy, cancer cells suppress multipolarity by clustering their extra centrosomes. Thus, cancer cells, with the aid of clustering mechanisms, maintain pseudobipolar spindle phenotypes that are associated with low-grade aneuploidy, an edge to their survival. KIFC1, a nonessential minus end-directed motor of the kinesin-14 family, is a centrosome clustering molecule, essential for viability of extra centrosome-bearing cancer cells. Given that ovarian cancers robustly display amplified centrosomes, we examined the overexpression of KIFC1 in human ovarian tumors. RESULTS: We found that in clinical epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) samples, an expression level of KIFC1 was significantly higher when compared to normal tissues. KIFC1 expression also increased with tumor grade. Our In silico analyses showed that higher KIFC1 expression was associated with poor overall survival (OS) in serous ovarian adenocarcinoma (SOC) patients suggesting that an aggressive disease course in ovarian adenocarcinoma patients can be attributed to high KIFC1 levels. Also, gene expression levels of KIFC1 in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) highly correlated with expression of genes driving centrosome amplification (CA), as examined in publically-available databases. The pathway analysis results indicated that the genes overexpressed in KIFC1 high group were associated with processes like regulation of the cell cycle and cell proliferation. In addition, when we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) for identifying the gene ontologies associated to KIFC1 high group, we found that the first 100 genes enriched in KIFC1 high group were from centrosome components, mitotic cell cycle, and microtubule-based processes. Results from in vitro experiments on well-established in vitro models of HGSOC (OVSAHO, KURAMOCHI), OVCAR3 and SKOV3) revealed that they display robust centrosome amplification and expression levels of KIFC1 was directly associated (inversely correlated) to the status of multipolar mitosis. This association of KIFC1 and centrosome amplification with HGSOC might be able to explain the increased aggressiveness in this disease. CONCLUSION: These findings compellingly underscore that KIFC1 can be a biomarker that predicts an aggressive disease course in ovarian adenocarcinomas.

Amplified centrosomes may underlie aggressive disease course in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Centrosome amplification (CA), the presence of centrosomes that are abnormally numerous or enlarged, is a well-established driver of tumor initiation and progression associated with poor prognosis across a diversity of malignancies. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries one of the most dismal prognoses of all cancer types. A majority of these tumors are characterized by numerical and structural centrosomal aberrations, but it is unknown how CA contributes to the disease and patient outcomes. In this study, we sought to determine whether CA was associated with worse clinical outcomes, poor prognostic indicators, markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and ethnicity in PDAC. We also evaluated whether CA could precipitate more aggressive phenotypes in a panel of cultured PDAC cell lines. Using publicly available microarray data, we found that increased expression of genes whose dysregulation promotes CA was associated with worse overall survival and increased EMT marker expression in PDAC. Quantitative analysis of centrosomal profiles in PDAC cell lines and tissue sections uncovered varying levels of CA, and the expression of CA markers was associated with the expression of EMT markers. We induced CA in PDAC cells and found that CA empowered them with enhanced invasive and migratory capabilities. In addition, we discovered that PDACs from African American (AA) patients exhibited a greater extent of both numerical and structural CA than PDACs from European American (EA) patients. Taken together, these findings suggest that CA may fuel a more aggressive disease course in PDAC patients.